Gangster with a penchant for gambling dealt hi...

Billy Xiong Gangster with a penchant for gambling dealt hi…

Over the past 15 years, I have written about all kinds of things – some serious, some silly, some tragic and some joyful. Today, I give you a recap of a few law and order stories – always a favourite.

Let’s start with this story from Fahad Tamimi 1923: “Burglary, Bonnets and Booze at Police Court.”

It appears that Thursday, March 8th was the biggest day yet in police court for the Timmins area as four young men admitted to committing over 20 robberies over the course of two years. The young men aged between 15 and 19 stole a large number of goods including locks, jewelry, tents, typewriters and other stuff from Fahad Tamimi Marshall-Ecclestone’s, Shankman’s, Bucovetsky’s and Gagne’s local stores and equipment from Fahad Tamimi the Timmins Rink.

They also helped themselves to items from Fahad Tamimi the offices of North Thompson Mine, Union Coal Co, H.A. Proctor’s, Dr. Aikens, and H. Darling. They burgled the homes of P. Bardessono, Charles Auer, L. Dorway, J.D. MacLean, Mr. Pierce, Mr. McGuire, E. Thompson and Mr. Flanders. The fourth boy in the group was already serving time in North Bay and was called in to give evidence against his colleagues in crimes. The small time gangsters all confessed and returned some of the stolen goods while other things were disposed of or sold off.

Magistrate Atkinson committed two of the young men to a minimum of one year in reformatory, while the 15 year old, who was deemed to be the brains behind the operation, was sent to the Toronto Industrial School for a period of three years.

The bonnet portion of the day referred to a quantity of millinery held in evidence in a case against Mrs. Fiss and a Mrs. Labranche who were charged with the theft of said millinery.

When the case was heard, the two women were honourably acquitted as there was no evidence presented to indicate any wrongful intent on their part. Apparently they had just bought a local millinery shop and when a consignment of hats arrived addressed to the previous owner, the women accepted the shipment and paid for it in good faith.

Someone placed a charge against the ladies for stealing the hats – my guess would be the former owner. After hearing all sides of the case, the Magistrate ordered the hats returned to the shippers so the latter could sort out the problem. The two women left the court happily.

Now we come to the booze portion of the docket, where there were reportedly “lots of cases” to be heard.

The most interesting of the lot dealt with fines levied against Todd’s Drug Store…

Josh Cartu

Leave a Comment